Week 4 Dynasty Risers and Fallers — 2026 Season

The dynasty players who moved furthest up and down the Edge board in Week 4, measured against the board from about a week earlier.

Jawhar Jordan leads Week 4's value risers. Below: the largest climbs up the Edge board this week and the largest slides down it, with a one-sentence per-row read on whether the move is sticky or about to mean-revert.

Edge values as of 2026-09-30 · week-over-week vs the board published 2026-09-23 (7-day gap) · page generated 2026-10-01 03:55 UTC.

Risers — Week 4

# Player Pos Board move Edge tier
1 Jawhar Jordan RB +5.2 pts Bench
2 Emmett Johnson RB +3.0 pts Bench
3 Travis Kelce TE +2.8 pts Bench
4 Jalen Coker WR +2.5 pts Bench
5 Dalton Kincaid TE +2.2 pts Bench
6 Antonio Williams WR +1.4 pts Bench
7 Malachi Fields WR +1.2 pts Bench
8 George Kittle TE +1.1 pts Bench
9 Michael Penix QB +1.1 pts Bench
10 Matthew Golden WR +1.0 pts Bench

1. Jawhar Jordan (RB). Up +5.2 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

2. Emmett Johnson (RB). Up +3.0 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

3. Travis Kelce (TE). Up +2.8 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

4. Jalen Coker (WR). Up +2.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

5. Dalton Kincaid (TE). Up +2.2 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

6. Antonio Williams (WR). Up +1.4 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

7. Malachi Fields (WR). Up +1.2 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

8. George Kittle (TE). Up +1.1 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

9. Michael Penix (QB). Up +1.1 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

10. Matthew Golden (WR). Up +1.0 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Acquisition prices usually climb further once a move like this is visible to the whole room — if you want shares, bid before the market finishes pricing it in.

Fallers — Week 4

# Player Pos Board move Edge tier
1 Carson Wentz QB -1.7 pts Bench
2 Jayden Reed WR -0.8 pts Bench
3 Jaylen Warren RB -0.7 pts Bench
4 Luther Burden WR -0.7 pts Depth
5 Courtland Sutton WR -0.6 pts Bench
6 Cam Ward QB -0.5 pts Depth
7 DK Metcalf WR -0.5 pts Bench
8 Jayden Daniels QB -0.5 pts High-end Starter
9 Rome Odunze WR -0.5 pts Depth
10 Terry McLaurin WR -0.5 pts Bench

1. Carson Wentz (QB). Down +1.7 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

2. Jayden Reed (WR). Down +0.8 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

3. Jaylen Warren (RB). Down +0.7 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

4. Luther Burden (WR). Down +0.7 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Depth tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

5. Courtland Sutton (WR). Down +0.6 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

6. Cam Ward (QB). Down +0.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Depth tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

7. DK Metcalf (WR). Down +0.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

8. Jayden Daniels (QB). Down +0.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the High-end Starter tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

9. Rome Odunze (WR). Down +0.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Depth tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

10. Terry McLaurin (WR). Down +0.5 pts on the board week-over-week inside the Bench tier. Worth a buy-low look only if the underlying usage has not changed — a drop after one quiet week typically mean-reverts.

How this page is built

How this page is built: we compare the Edge board published for this page against the same board as it stood roughly seven days earlier, player by player, and rank the largest moves in each direction. "Week-over-week" means one specific thing here: the same value model's published board, read again at an earlier publish, chosen to be about 7 days before the one above. It is never a different model, a different scoring format or a stored copy of a summary — both sides are the same file recomputed the same way, so the difference is the market moving and not the measurement changing. If the nearest earlier publish is closer than 3 days, further than 14, or missing, this page is not published for that week. Moves are measured as a change in where a player sits on the board rather than as a change in their price, so a week where the whole board drifts does not read as everybody rising; the figure in each row is that shift, in percentile points, and the tier change beside it is what it amounted to. A player who was not on the earlier board is left out rather than shown as unchanged. Tier words come from the same seven-tier ladder the app uses, read from one shared thresholds file, so a tier means the same thing here as it does on your roster screen. A player the value model has not priced is shown as Unrated rather than dropped to the bottom tier. Individual Edge figures are withheld on purpose: a price is quoted for one league format, and a bare number in a search result has no format attached to it. Nothing here is hand-picked, hand-ranked or hand-written, and if a source was missing or stale when the site rebuilt, this page was not published at all.

Related this week